Why do physicians join group practices




















A group medical practice is typically either a single-specialty and multispecialty practice. Single-specialty practice is when two or more physicians provide patients with one specific type of A multispecialty group practice is offers various types of medical specialty care within one organization.

Some distinct advantages of a group medical practice are the increased financial security and a better control of lifestyle. Because of the larger number of physicians and increased size of the patient base, group medical practices are usually better able to accept and manage financial risk than solo practices.

Health Aff ; 30 — Managing chronic illness: physician practices increased the use of care management and medical home processes.

Health Aff ; 34 — Are changes in medical group practice characteristics over time associated with Medicare spending and quality of care?

Med Care Res Rev ; 77 Freemyer B, Stoff B. Ethical challenges with treating nonadherent patients in a group practice setting. J Am Acad Dermatol ; 79 —8. Sellers EM. The influences of group and independent general practice on patient care: a comparative study in Ontario.

Can Med Assoc J ; 93 — Urologist practice affiliation and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol ; 73 —8. Landon BE. Use of quality indicators in patient care: a senior primary care physician trying to take good care of his patients.

JAMA ; — Physician satisfaction in group practice: a comparison of primary care physicians with specialists. Ghaa J ; 7 —9. Prevalence of chronic stress in general practitioners and practice assistants: personal, practice and regional characteristics.

PLoS One ; 12 :e Experiences of family physicians who practise primary care obstetrics in groups. J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 33 —6. Hueston WJ. Family physicians' satisfaction with practice.

Arch Fam Med ; 7 —7. Job satisfaction, psychological morbidity and job stress among New Zealand general practitioners. N Z Med J ; — Satisfaction with career choice among U. Plast Reconstr Surg ; — Mental well-being and job satisfaction among general practitioners: a nationwide cross-sectional survey in Denmark.

BMC Fam Pract ; 19 An analysis of physician recruitment strategies in rural hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev ; 20 :7— Verbeek-Heida PM. General practitioners' attitudes towards group practice in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med ; 3 — Stamps PL. Physicians and organizations: an uneasy alliance or a welcome relief? J Fam Pract ; 41 — Insights of private general practitioners in group practice on the introduction of national health insurance in South Africa.

Evashwick CJ. The role of group practice in the distribution of physicians in nonmetropolitan areas. Med Care ; 14 — Professional burnout among US plastic surgeons: results of a national survey. Ann Plast Surg ; 72 — Depersonalised doctors: a cross-sectional study of doctors, consultations and patient reports in UK general practice. BMJ Open ; 2 :e Mahoney AR. Factors affecting physicians' choice of group or independent practice.

Inquiry ; 10 :9— Quantifying the impact of cross coverage on physician's workload and performance in radiation oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol ; 3 :e— Hands on: is there an association between doing procedures and job satisfaction?

Can Fam Physician ; 53 Community size and organization of practice predict family physician recertification success. J Am Board Fam Med ; 27 — Informal peer interaction and practice type as predictors of physician performance on maintenance of certification examinations. JAMA Surg ; — Assessing the cultures of medical group practices. J Am Board Fam Pract ; 16 —8. Transforming medical care: case study of an exemplary, small medical group. Ann Fam Med ; 4 — Organizational culture and physician satisfaction with dimensions of group practice.

Health Serv Res ; 42 — Workplace relational factors and physicians' intention to withdraw from practice. Health Care Manage Rev ; 33 — Society of General Internal Medicine 34th Annual Meeting Abstracts of submissions In: Addressing chronic conflict and problematic behaviors in a group practice , Lowes R. Group practices pay better. Med Econ ; 84 —5. Differences in practice income between solo and group practice physicians.

Health Policy ; 79 — What future for solo general practice? N Z Med J ; —2. Graham JW. Comparisons of solo practices and group practices. Rose I. Aspects of group medical practice. Can Med Assoc J ; 98 Davies S. N Z Med J ; 90 —3. Estimation of a physician practice cost function. Eur J Health Econ ; 18 — Physician productivity and returns to scale. Health Serv Res ; 12 — The relationship between the external environment and physician e-mail communication: the mediating role of health information technology availability.

Health Care Manage Rev ; 42 — Factors influencing family physician adoption of electronic health records EHRs. J Am Board Fam Med ; 26 — Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Informatics Assoc ; 18 —5. Terris M. Introduction: origins and growth of group practice. Weinerman ER. Problems and perspectives of group practice. Sturm R. Effect of managed care and financing on practice constraints and career satisfaction in primary care.

J Am Board Fam Pract ; 15 — The impact of practice setting and financial incentives on career satisfaction and perceived practice limitations among surgeons.

Am J Surg ; —5. Holden DM. Rural practice modes. Acad Med ; 65 :S32— Establishing a group practice "without walls". Health Care Strateg Manage ; 11 — Wallace JD. Group practice: the way of the future?

Can Med Assoc J ; The relationships of physician practice characteristics to quality of care and costs. Health Serv Res ; 50 — Efficiency of physician specialist groups. The effect of income pooling within a call group on rates of obstetric intervention.

Physicians working in a group practice experience the benefits of shorter work hours, built-in on-call coverage, and access to more working capital. All of these factors can lead to less stress. The drawbacks include less individual freedom, limits on the ability to rapidly grow income, and the need for a consensus on business decisions. A health maintenance organization, or HMO, employs providers to care for their members and beneficiaries.

The goal of HMOS is to decrease medical costs for those consumers. The benefits for providers working for an HMO include a more stable work life with regular hours. Other benefits include less paperwork and regulatory responsibilities and a regular salary along with bonus opportunities. These bonuses are based on productivity or patient satisfaction. In reality, the main drawback for physicians working for an HMO is the lack of autonomy.

In hospital based work, physicians earn a predictable income, have a regular patient base, and a solid referral network. Physicians who are employed by a hospital will either work in a hospital-owned practice or in a department of the hospital itself. The benefits of working for a hospital include a regular work schedule, low to no business and legal risk, and a steady flow of income. On the other hand, there are drawbacks, such as a relative lack of physician autonomy.

Also, employee constraints and the expectation that physicians become involved in hospital committee work can be drawbacks. This type of practice has been around since the last s. These types of positions offer temporary employment and may offer higher pay than more permanent employment situations.

Physicians working in locum tenens scenarios enjoy the benefits of variety and the ability to experience numerous types of practices and geographic locations. Solo vs. Group Practice: What are the Pros and Cons? Some of the pros of independent practice ownership include: Ability to hire and fire staff Setting your own hours Ability to diversify practice offerings Multiple doctors can be partners in a practice Use of vendor partners such as HR and billing at a manageable cost Drive business performance to meet your unique goals However, for every pro there is a con.

This include things like: Responsible for all office expenses Always on call and may need to cover for others Need to manage HR function Responsible for billing Depending on your long-term goals and preferences, independent practice may not be right for you. Submit Local News Here. Login Register.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000